It was a hotly-contested point on her New York Senatorial bid. She promised her constituents she’d be their senator for the duration of her elected term. This meant that she could not be seeking nomination as the democratic candidate for president in 2008. Well I’ll be a mule’s testicle: She’s officially in the democratic primary race. We republican voters all knew it was coming, we’re not stupid. There was no doubt in my mind that 2008 would be the year we’d have to endure the second iteration of the Clinton campaign. So since she’s a candidate now (officially), she’s officially a bold-faced liar.

Will any of the democratic voters care? Hell no; that’s not what being a liberal is about. Being a liberal is about believing the message which is shouted the loudest, no matter what message the loudest contradicts. Can you contradict yourself as a democrat? Yes, and without penatly. The only key is that you say something like “The Republicans made me do it”, or “Because I believe so strongly in America…” whilst you pound your fists on your podium, and talk into an MTV camera at spring break. (also make sure you have your top blouse or shirt button undone)

Hillary Clinton will look these voters in the eyes and tell them how she is honest, hard-working, dedicated, and moral. All the while, she’s lied about even becoming a candidate, has never done a day’s work in her life, dedicated only to herself, and morally - well brothers and sisters, this is Hillary we’re talking about; the Clinton morals get their own paragraph.

Do our leaders dictate what morals are? Do we set our moral standards by the morals exhibited by our national leaders? Or, do we have a duty to hold our leaders to our standards of morals? I think both questions are invalid. No one person or group of people can determine what is moral, and what is not. Morals are above human intervention. Morals aren’t situational, negotiable, and can’t be changed, that’s why they are so important.

So why is it that when Bill Clinton has his cock in an intern’s mouth, it’s not our (American tax-paying citizens) job to question the morality of the man? Why can’t I ask him why he’s embarassed America? Why can’t I ask him why he said “Listen to me America…I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.” when it had been proven that he did? I’ll tell you why: “Clinton morals”.

If you think Bill is the only Clinton with the “Clinton morals”, you’re mistaken. Apparently you can use them if you’re even married to a Clinton. Let’s not forget that the whitewater scandal, the mysterious murders, and the complete coverup and shutdown circulated around Hillary, and not Bill so much. Let’s not forget that it was Hillary’s involvement with those people which brought Kenneth Star out of the cracks to pursue legal action.

Then there was the Clinton Lame-duck pardons. How many murderers did he free before leaving the whitehouse? Oh, and what about the furniture theft?

What’s wrong with all of this shit is that nothing listed is immoral, at least not to the democrats. What is immoral is to question these actions and behaviors. That’s wrong.

So let’s add to this track record the bold-faced lie that Hillary told to the American people when she promised she’d go all six years on her senatorial term only to step up as a democratic hopeful in 2008.

I hope her opposition points this out during the campaigns. As long as they’re louder, and they leverage hollywood and the music industry (including YouTube and MySpace) better than Hillary, the average democratic voter will stomp her out without thinking about it (honestly).